Notebookcheck 8xxm & R9 M290X Benchmarks!
Now with 840m, 870m & 880m benchmarks!.
Here are links for all of the benchmarks I have put below. (880m Benchmarks, 870m Benchmarks, 840m Benchmarks, 750m Benchmarks, 760m Benchmarks, 850m Benchmarks, 860M Benchmarks, 770m Benchmarks, [URL="http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-780M.88993.0.html"]780m Benchmaks, R9 M290X Benchmarks[/URL])
I'll quickly go over the benchmarks for Battlefield 4, Metro Last Light & Crysis 3 (ultra & high settings) for those of you who don't want to or are unable to click the links. I hope it is easy to read.
PS: Before i begin with the results, the 850m is the DDR3 version! The GDDR5 version performs SLIGHTLY better (1-3 fps) in most games, in some games the difference can be 10fps+.
The 800m series is has a great increase in performance from the 700m series and that's without any performance updates, the 850m can easily play most modern games, probably at 1080p if you turn the AA down/off.
The R9 M290X on the other hand... That is looking really poor, I'm 90% sure it's going to be in the same price range as the 870m or 880m but just barely beats the 860m (but loses in crysis 3 :L). If they want it to sell, it's gonna have to have some pretty extraordinary updates to improve performance, or is gonna have to be in the same price bracket as the 860m.
Now with 840m, 870m & 880m benchmarks!.
Here are links for all of the benchmarks I have put below. (880m Benchmarks, 870m Benchmarks, 840m Benchmarks, 750m Benchmarks, 760m Benchmarks, 850m Benchmarks, 860M Benchmarks, 770m Benchmarks, [URL="http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-780M.88993.0.html"]780m Benchmaks, R9 M290X Benchmarks[/URL])
I'll quickly go over the benchmarks for Battlefield 4, Metro Last Light & Crysis 3 (ultra & high settings) for those of you who don't want to or are unable to click the links. I hope it is easy to read.
PS: Before i begin with the results, the 850m is the DDR3 version! The GDDR5 version performs SLIGHTLY better (1-3 fps) in most games, in some games the difference can be 10fps+.
Battlefield 4 Benchmarks
750m Ultra- 13.0fps
750m High- 34.8fps
760m Ultra- 18.9fps
760m High- 47.1fps
770m Ultra- 27.8fps
770m High- 67.7fps
780m Ultra- 40.0fps
780m High- 88.7fps
840m Ultra- N/A (no results on page)
840m High- 27.5fps
850m Ultra- 20.4fps
850m High- 55.4fps
860m Ultra- 28.9fps
860m High- 73.7fps
870m Ultra- 37fps
870m High- 92fps
880m Ultra- 48fps
880m High- 115fps
M290X Ultra- 38.7fps
M290X High- 73.9fps
Metro Last Light Benchmarks
750m Ultra- 11.0fps
750m High- 21.0fps
760m Ultra- N/A
760m High- 30.3fps
770m Ultra- 26.7fps
770m High- 50.1fps
780m Ultra- 37.0fps
780m High- 68.0fps
840m Ultra- N/A (no results on page)
840m High- 22fps
850m Ultra- 21.5fps
850m High- 40.7fps
860m Ultra- 28.6fps
860m High- 56.0fps
870m Ultra- 34fps
870m High- 61fps
880m Ultra- 42fps
880m High- 76fps
M290X Ultra- 33.1fps
M290X High- 60.0fps
Crysis 3 Benchmarks
750m Ultra- 10.0fps
750m High- 24.0fps
760m Ultra- 13.0fps
760m Ultra- 34.0fps
770m Ultra- 19.8fps
770m High- 49.8fps
780m Ultra- 32.0fps
780m High- 72.2fps
840m Ultra- N/A (no results on page)
840m High- 16.3fps
850m Ultra- 13.1fps
850m High- 34.4fps
860m Ultra- 19.0fps
860m High- 51.0fps
870m Ultra- 27fps
870m High- 66fps
880m Ultra- 33.2fps
880m High- 81.5fps
M290X Ultra- 22.8fps
M290X High- 48.2fps
Settings For Ultra
1920x1080, Ultra Preset, AF, 4x MSAA
Settings for High- 1366x768, High Preset, AF, AA
750m Ultra- 13.0fps
750m High- 34.8fps
760m Ultra- 18.9fps
760m High- 47.1fps
770m Ultra- 27.8fps
770m High- 67.7fps
780m Ultra- 40.0fps
780m High- 88.7fps
840m Ultra- N/A (no results on page)
840m High- 27.5fps
850m Ultra- 20.4fps
850m High- 55.4fps
860m Ultra- 28.9fps
860m High- 73.7fps
870m Ultra- 37fps
870m High- 92fps
880m Ultra- 48fps
880m High- 115fps
M290X Ultra- 38.7fps
M290X High- 73.9fps
Metro Last Light Benchmarks
Settings For Ultra
1920x1080, Very High Settings (DX11), 16x AF, AA
Settings for High1366x768, High Settings (DX11), 16x AF, AA
750m Ultra- 11.0fps
750m High- 21.0fps
760m Ultra- N/A
760m High- 30.3fps
770m Ultra- 26.7fps
770m High- 50.1fps
780m Ultra- 37.0fps
780m High- 68.0fps
840m Ultra- N/A (no results on page)
840m High- 22fps
850m Ultra- 21.5fps
850m High- 40.7fps
860m Ultra- 28.6fps
860m High- 56.0fps
870m Ultra- 34fps
870m High- 61fps
880m Ultra- 42fps
880m High- 76fps
M290X Ultra- 33.1fps
M290X High- 60.0fps
Crysis 3 Benchmarks
Settings For Ultra
1920x1080, Very High Preset, 16xAF, 2xSMAA
Settings for High1366x768, High Preset, 16xAF, FXAA
750m Ultra- 10.0fps
750m High- 24.0fps
760m Ultra- 13.0fps
760m Ultra- 34.0fps
770m Ultra- 19.8fps
770m High- 49.8fps
780m Ultra- 32.0fps
780m High- 72.2fps
840m Ultra- N/A (no results on page)
840m High- 16.3fps
850m Ultra- 13.1fps
850m High- 34.4fps
860m Ultra- 19.0fps
860m High- 51.0fps
870m Ultra- 27fps
870m High- 66fps
880m Ultra- 33.2fps
880m High- 81.5fps
M290X Ultra- 22.8fps
M290X High- 48.2fps
The 800m series is has a great increase in performance from the 700m series and that's without any performance updates, the 850m can easily play most modern games, probably at 1080p if you turn the AA down/off.
The R9 M290X on the other hand... That is looking really poor, I'm 90% sure it's going to be in the same price range as the 870m or 880m but just barely beats the 860m (but loses in crysis 3 :L). If they want it to sell, it's gonna have to have some pretty extraordinary updates to improve performance, or is gonna have to be in the same price bracket as the 860m.
Last edited: