Benchmark Results Leaderboard

CountingDown said:

Thanks for posting. I find it interesting that the Timespy score for your 7950x is the same as mine for a 7800x3D...either TS can't fully utilise a CPU or it points to the strength of the 7800x3D. Will gave to try Firestrike to see (have been meaning to do it but haven't got round to it)

Click to expand...

Your CPU score is unlikely to be the same? The overall score tends to be more GPU driven than CPU driven

Without overclocking it's not too bad. I think higher results tend to be in the 53k mark. This is likely PBO/EXPO driven though.

The CPU has an impact on how well the GPU can run. You will get different GPU scores with different CPUs. The 7800X3D is one of the best for support.

Other than forcing Quality image in the drivers, that is with stock settings after I reinstalled the drivers without Geforce Experience and both results should be my new pc for a 7950/4090 vs my old 5950/3090.
edit correction I posted the old pc's fire strike
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/30101041 54 598 is my newest

Which has been a problem since I got it, I have one golden rule I broke, never buy first gen, give it 6 months to mature/hardware/bios revisions. So this time I didn't get anything under 6 months old like the old pc. It had a few issues with it which caused regular reboots which I could not rule out to any one bit of hardware,

I could have gone for the X3D variant of amd but it was just too new for revisions to have been made for me to be happy.

Gus said:

Other than forcing Quality image in the drivers, that is with stock settings after I reinstalled the drivers without Geforce Experience and both results should be my new pc for a 7950/5950 vs my old 5950/3090.
edit correction I posted the old pc's fire strike
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/30101041 54 598 is my newest

Which has been a problem since I got it, I have one golden rule I broke, never buy first gen, give it 6 months to mature/hardware/bios revisions. So this time I didn't get anything under 6 months old like the old pc. It had a few issues with it which caused regular reboots which I could not rule out to any one bit of hardware,

I could have gone for the X3D variant of amd but it was just too new for revisions to have been made for me to be happy.

PCSPECIALIST - Configure the AMD Am5 PC to your ideal requirements.

PCSpecialist is an award-winning manufacturer of high quality custom PCs & Laptops. Configure the AMD Am5 PC to your ideal requirements.

www.pcspecialist.co.uk

Click to expand...

You've customised some of the NVidia settings. This is actually hampering your GPU performance. Your system has a higher score in it

@Scott well you don't buy a 4090 and set it to minimum, I want all bells and whistles firing at all times. If I had a 4060 then yeah low or mid, but its a 4090

Gus said:

@Scott well you don't buy a 4090 and set it to minimum, I want all bells and whistles firing at all times. If I had a 4060 then yeah low or mid, but its a 4090

Click to expand...

Not sure what you mean. What I'm saying is, with your Firestrike score, the GPU score is low due to customising the Nvidia settings outwith the spec that 3DMark recognises. If you want the best out of the GPU you should default the Nvidia settings and then turn on Prefer Maximum performance. Then if you re-run Firestrike the scores will go up.

Before an OC with the 4080...... this is going to be closer than I thought

47436 https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/94550735?

So now I've had some spare time, I thought I'd do a run of 3D Mark Benchmark tests.
This is the updated Ulfheanor, with AMD R7 7700X and ASUS AMD RX 7900 RX.
It's just as I'm using it now, nothing adjusted. Exactly as it has been being used to run games, the usual kind of programmes for a home user to have installed, files saved, and a good years worth of wear and tear and junk. Nothing else running, as far as I know.
I haven't even opened up my RAM to 6000, because I'm a bit nervous of going into the BIOS and 'hitting the wrong button'.


This was the 2nd Time Spy test run, the first one had a slightly higher score of 22,132, but it was unable to collect any hardware data. Why that was I don't know, I just ran it again and it collected it all that time.

Here's mine...(didn't realise I'd ran the Time Spy Extreme benchmark originally, so have just done the normal one...

Surprised how close I got with a 4080

Scott said:

Surprised how close I got with a 4080

I scored 50 849 in Fire Strike

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

www.3dmark.com

Click to expand...

On some runs, I've had lower than that!

No changes between runs, and temps are more or less the same 🤷‍♂️

Although I found out my GPU PCIe slot was running at x8 instead of x16 as I'd been playing with PCIe bifurcation to get more m.2s to be seen on my Asus Hyper-X card - but the motherboard only supports a single device on that 2nd PCIe slot - but I'd forgotten to turn it back from RAID mode.

Thought I'd do one of these while I'm testing/monitoring the CPU temps. It's been peaking around 95/96c on HWMonitor.. Would like to get that down ideally. Not tried the Custom Mode/PL functions in CC yet. Here's mine:


Edit: Time Spy had it run into 97/98c as did rendering a video in Davinci Resolve yesterday. Are these normal temps for this setup during benching/rendering?