Clevo X170SM-G (17,3" RECOIL IV) review *in progress*

fejerm

Active member
Here are my initial thoughts on the new Clevo X170SM-G laptop (named the 17,3" RECOIL IV at PC Specialist).

My config:
CPU: 10700K
RAM: 4Gb
SSD: 256 Gb PCS
VGA: RTX 2080 Super
Screen: 240 Hz FHD G-Sync

Build time
From processing time to dispatch it took 8 working days.

Packaging
The packaging is the same as for earlier Clevo laptops shipped by PCS. A standard "Notebook" box in a bigger box for better protection.

iaCoK3Q.jpg


HYauQ6g.jpg

4YIEML8.jpg


Inside the box besides the laptop and adapters you will find the PCS welcome package with the manual and some extra screws in case you wish to install your own SSD inside:

0vjxRC6.jpg

The package also includes some thermal paste however unless you need it for an emergency, I do not recommend using this since the paste included is the one used by PCS for building, which is a generic paste with avarage thermal conductivity. For best performance you need better paste, like Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, or if you are well experienced with liquid metal then using Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut is the best solution in case a repaste is needed.
Warning! Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut is electically conductive, if you are not experienced with this paste and you spill it on the motherboard, then cleaning is mandatory before you turn the laptop on because in can, and will cause a short circuit!

BIOS
Compared to the previous flash ship Clevo laptop offered by PCS (The Clevo P775TM1-G or Octane VI with PCS naming) the BIOS is kinda disappointing.
The P775TM used AMI BIOS with old gen interface, while the X170SM is using Insyde BIOS with graphical userinterface. However the main problem is that the P775TM had 2 options available in the BIOS:
- memory settings (including XMP settings)
- cpu settings (overclocking and voltage settings).

These 2 options were a very good thing because not many other laptop manufacturers offered these inside the bios and users had to use 3rd party software to tweak voltage and cpu, not to mention xmp settings which made it possible to use high speed rams in the machine.

Clevo sent out X170SM laptops to testers with these options which made Clevo a fan favorite for many users, however in the final production units Clevo installed a BIOS which for some reason has hidden all of these options.
Here are the available options in the X170SM BIOS (.02 version):

uNufnQo.jpg

vs3qxKh.jpg

RXqaias.jpg

dTREcdf.jpg

RKewMKT.jpg


As you can see Clevo has disable all options in the final BIOS which involves performance tweaking. No undervolting in the BIOS? no core ratio settings in the BIOS and expesially no XMP settings in the BIOS like there was with previous Clevo laptops. These options were all available in an earlier, engineering BIOS, however Clevo decided to disable these.

What this mean is:
1) if you need to overclock the cpu or change voltage you need to use the Clevo Control Center which can cause bugs. This setting is not available until you enable overclocking feature in the bios but even after that CCC must be reinstalled because the option does become visible

2) supported RAMs are limited because the hidden XMP option. Currently the fastest laptop ram is a Crucial ram with 3200 Mhz frequency and CL16 timing, however XMP profile is needed to enable this which for reasons unknown CLevo hid. Because of this these ram moduls will only run at 2666 Mhz.
If you want the full 3200 Mhz RAM frequency, then you need a JEDEC ram. Currently the best one is made by Crucial which is 3200 Mhz CL22. The part number for 2x16 Gb KIT is CT32G4SFD832A.
Not many games but some can show really big difference in FPS between CL16 and CL22, however 3200 Mhz CL16 is not available due to an unknown reason made by Clevo and only 3200 Mhz CL22 is supported.

VGA

The VGA used in my X170 is the RTX 2080 Super which is a slight upgrade compared to the RTX 2080 used in the P775.
Here are the GPU-Z info side by side with the differences between the 2 cards:

lIWrunq.png


As you can see there are 2 physical and 1 software difference between the 2 cards. The physical difference is that the Super variant has slightly more Shaders and Texture Mapping Units than the RTX 2080 which in practical usage means about an extra 5-10 FPS in games.
The software difference is in the GPU/BOOST clock. The Super has slightly higher clocks due to the fact that Clevo has set the Thermal Power Limit to 150W in the RTX 2080, however the limit in the Super variant is 200W. Due to the extra headroom Clevo was able to set slightls higher clock. These extra clock speeds mean about 2-3 FPS extra in games.
So in a total due to the more Shaders, TMUs and higher clock speeds users can expect about +10 FPS with the Super variant. Not a big deal for P775TM1-G users to sell their laptops, however for new customers this is a good reason to go with the Super variant instead of the non Super one.

Power adapters

The P775TM1-G used 1 single power brick, 1 huge 330W Delta adapter which in some scnearios was barely able to provide enough juice for the laptop, expesially if one configured the system with an RTX 2080 and 9900K.
With the X170SM-G Clevo stepped up the game and now include 2 adapters instead of 1. Each adapter is a Chicony made 280W brick which totals up to 560W.

Layed out on the table they can take up quite a space:

15MVWLZ.jpg


However Clevo include a little holder in the box which allows you to stack the adapters on each other to save some space:

44dGdt4.jpg


This holder shoudl be included with every order made at PCS.

But the question, is 560W really needed? Well maybe with a 10900K and overclocking yes, however running a 10700K and RTX 2080 Super at stock settings the system pulls around 330W from the wall.

HwfL21j.jpg


The above was measured while Time Spy was running.

Screen

The fastest screen available for gaming for the P775TM was the AU Optronics B173HAN03.1 panel which is a 144 Hz panel. It supportst G-Sync and has a response time of around 16 ms. This is the gray to gray response time which is comminly used to market response time by monitor manufacturers. There is also the black to white response which is about 9 ms, however Clevo marketed this panel as a 9ms panel, however if we whish to measure the panel the same way as a desktop monitor then we can say that the 144 Hz G-Sync panel used for the P775TM is an IPS panel with 16 ms response time. Not the best expesially since there are already IPS panel for laptops with 6 ms gray to gray response time, however do not worry. There is a slight blurriness because of the 16 ms time however it is perfectly acceptable and will not bother you unless you put it side by side to a 1 ms TN panel or unless you are looking something to pick on.
The very minimal motion blur will not affect your gameplay experience.

But why did I mention this in so detail ?
Well the fastest panel for the X170 is a 240 hz panel. The 240 hz panel is a AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 240 Hz IPS G-Sync panel.

D2SFVIx.png


The "problem" is however is response time. Despite much higher refresh rate, the B173HAN05.1 has around the same response time as the B173HAN03.1 meaning the 240 Hz panel has around 16 ms response time.

However there are 2 things why I would prefer to go with the 240 Hz panel (and did) over the 144 Hz one used in the P775:
1) response time: there are games that can reach 144 FPS and G-Sync only works until 144 FPS, above that you will see screen tearing. To avoid this you need to enable V-Sync besides G-Sync. Until 144 FPS G-Sync will work however if the game reaches that V-Sync will lock the framerate to avoid screen tearing. However when V-Sync kicks in some people who have really good eyes might experience some extra lag and microstuttering (the amount depends on game and game engine). With the 240 Hz panel much less game will reach the V-Sync limit and G-Sync has more headroom to make games smoother.

2) Better color space. The B173HAN03.1 144 Hz panel can display around 88% sRGB, while the B173HAN05.0 240 Hz panel can display around 98% sRGB, so the faster panel has slightly better colors. Not OLED quality, but still it looks pretty good.

Oh and not to mention that I tested several 144 Hz panels and all had noticable backlight bleeding, however maybe I am juct lucky but the 240 Hz panel that came with my order also has some minimal bleeding but significatly better than the 144 Hz panels had. No, it is not possible to buy a laptop with currently used IPS panels that absolutely backlight bleeding free, all IPS panels have this, it comes with the tech used, however the amount of backlight bleeding can vary between panels.

TO BE CONTINUED (reached character limit)
 
Last edited:

fejerm

Active member
SPEAKERS

The main problem with laptop speakers is the same as with speakers used in TVs (even in expensive OLED TVs): they are just a substitute until you get something better. There are laptops with decent ones like the Acer Predator G5, however there one ones that are absolutely garbage, like the ones used in the Alienware Area 51m. And there is the previous Clevo flasgship, the Clevo P775TM1-G. The speakers+subwoofer were decent, somethere between the 51M and G5, however they had 1 annoying issue which affected all of the P775 line (even the older ones) since all used the same speakers: the membrames of the speakers were bad quality and it had an annoying issue where high pitched sounds resonated. Some laptops only minimally had this problem but for some the issue was so bad that an RMA was mandatory. The best way to test it was to play the Crysis 3 main theme sound, the bad ones resonated so annoyingly that anyone could hear the problem.
I recorded this issue and I assume that anyone can hear it:

Clevo P775 (Octane series) speaker issue (click)

Luckely, Clevo changed the speakers and subwoofer and using a much better quality one in the X170SM-G. Much better sound and so far I did not experience the above mentioned issue.


*REVIEW WILL CONTINUE LATER*
 

fejerm

Active member
Sorry for not continuing however I have discovered several defects.
1 of the issues probably requires a VGA change (major gpu core clock and voltage jumping). My RTX 2080 Super is performing at around RTX 2070 Super - RTX 2080 (non Super) level. Not to mention that there are a lot of games and even some scenes in benchmarks that were smooth with the P775+RTX2080+144 Hz screen are now showing unexplained stuttering/hitching.
I have checked with several OS and driver and nothing helped. Other X170SM-G user who bought his system from PCS does not have this problem.

I have opened an RMA to get this resolve.

There is another issue which if my past experience and guess is right, will not be resolved with HW change. The issue is that the 240 Hz panel is showing ghosting if G-Sync is enabled. This is eitehr caused by badly tuned vBIOS, driver or EDID (screen panel firmware).
Clevo P775DM1-G had this issue and even many other laptops from other brands had this but it was never fixed. The only way it was "fixed" is when the manufaturer released a brand new laptop and the vBIOS/EDID was better optimized (no fix was released for previous laptops affected).
You can read about this inverse ghosting issue here:

I will continue with my review after the RMA so I could find out if the stuttering AND ghosting was caused by a bad hardware OR like before it is actually a manufacturing defect and all systems are affected.
So far I have seen others report this ghosting issue as well. So far I only heard about the 240 Hz panel being affected, I do not have any information if the 144 Hz LG panel which PCS also offers is affected or not.
 

FerrariVie

Super Star
I really liked your very detailed review! Please keep us updated on the RMA over stuttering and ghosting issues.
 

NovHak

Member
Ah, heck, thanks for information ! I may put it on hold until further informed then...

EDIT : Any news ? I did put it on hold actually.
 
Last edited:

NovHak

Member
One more month has gone... I just hope you didn't forget this thread ! Which would mean the RMA is taking a fair bit of time. Maybe I will choose another setup, or just refresh my old computer, that would buy me another two years or so.
 

fejerm

Active member
Hello!
No, I have not forgotten, however there are some issues with the RMA process.
 

NovHak

Member
@fejerm Thanks for the info ! Considering the situation I decided to wait, and instead I bought an MXM replacement for my ageing laptop. I'm not keen on taking such risks myself, especially considering the very high price...

When I bought my current computer back in 2014, I had to pay around 2000€ for it, with the most powerful Nvidia GPU of the time, the GTX 880M, 16GB RAM, 2TB HD + 240GB SSD, Core i7-4710MQ. Nowadays I would have to pay 50% more, that's insane. SSDs being almost mandatory + a dramatic increase in the GPU prices seem to be the reasons.

Anyway I will continue following this thread, so keep us informed and all the best with your RMA !
 

FerrariVie

Super Star
@fejerm Thanks for the info ! Considering the situation I decided to wait, and instead I bought an MXM replacement for my ageing laptop. I'm not keen on taking such risks myself, especially considering the very high price...

When I bought my current computer back in 2014, I had to pay around 2000€ for it, with the most powerful Nvidia GPU of the time, the GTX 880M, 16GB RAM, 2TB HD + 240GB SSD, Core i7-4710MQ. Nowadays I would have to pay 50% more, that's insane. SSDs being almost mandatory + a dramatic increase in the GPU prices seem to be the reasons.

Anyway I will continue following this thread, so keep us informed and all the best with your RMA !
I don't agree that you need to pay €3000 to get a great performing laptop. Look at the nova: Ryzen 9 3900 + RTX 2070 115W + 16 RAM + 1Tb NVME Samsung for around €1750, less than what you paid for your previous laptop 6 years ago.
 
Last edited:

RicDin

Member
Any news? I have ordered the Recoil IV just a couple of days ago. But now this review has left me with second thoughts.

I went with the I9-10850k and 144Hz screen but everything else is pretty much similar.
 
Top