GTX 970 3.5GB Vram Issue (BAD NEWS)

Wozza63

Biblical Poster
Whether it causes performance issues or not, the company lied and for lying to their customers they should offer a full refund to anyone who wants one.
 

keynes

Multiverse Poster
Whether it causes performance issues or not, the company lied and for lying to their customers they should offer a full refund to anyone who wants one.

From what I read online retailers are offering a refund or exchange + paying for the difference
 

Tom DWC

Moderator
Moderator
Thing is as soon as you run out of VRAM performance is going to take a huge hit anyway, whether that be at the 3.5GB mark or 4GB. I'm not sure what benefit disabling the 500mb would offer, it's still faster than reverting to system RAM (though not that much faster).

Has it been mis-sold, absolutely, but it isn't a problem with the card per-se, it's functioning as intended. Is it flawed? It does seem a bit of an odd choice but if this had been sold as a 3GB card with the performance that it offers it would probably still be lauded as a fantastic card for the money.

So really much more than the actual spec the issue is the misleading information NVIDIA put out, claiming it had the same amount of modules at the 980 when it didn't. Considering the 2nd tier card is nearly always cut down from the flagship this does seem strange. What went on behind closed doors who knows. I'm prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt this one time.
 

policematrix

Active member
Thing is as soon as you run out of VRAM performance is going to take a huge hit anyway, whether that be at the 3.5GB mark or 4GB. I'm not sure what benefit disabling the 500mb would offer, it's still faster than reverting to system RAM (though not that much faster).

Has it been mis-sold, absolutely, but it isn't a problem with the card per-se, it's functioning as intended. Is it flawed? It does seem a bit of an odd choice but if this had been sold as a 3GB card with the performance that it offers it would probably still be lauded as a fantastic card for the money.

So really much more than the actual spec the issue is the misleading information NVIDIA put out, claiming it had the same amount of modules at the 980 when it didn't. Considering the 2nd tier card is nearly always cut down from the flagship this does seem strange. What went on behind closed doors who knows. I'm prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt this one time.

If I wanted just a 1080 card there are many cheaper ones that will perform very close to this one and save you 150£ the point of this card was to some time in the future SLi it and be ready for 4K I know nothing is future proof but this card is now dead in the water and its resale value just dropped like a bomb but we still paid top dollar, I agree the card is awesome BUT and its a killer BUT (like my GFs ;p) its no 4K card and SLi makes very little difference.

I suppose money is the main issue for me it took years to save this money and I was not planning to buy a replacement card anytime soon so I feel they least they can do is remburst buyers with some sort of partial refund as the money I paid was real and did not have 50£ they could not spend.
 

keynes

Multiverse Poster
I suppose money is the main issue for me it took years to save this money and I was not planning to buy a replacement card anytime soon so I feel they least they can do is remburst buyers with some sort of partial refund as the money I paid was real and did not have 50£ they could not spend.
you mean some money back and keep the card? If you are not happy with it why not take the option for a refund (if available?)
 

nathanjrb

Prolific Poster
PoliceMatrix, I like your profile picture. That's all I have to contribute. Sorry.

*flies off on a jetpack*
 

Tom DWC

Moderator
Moderator
If I wanted just a 1080 card there are many cheaper ones that will perform very close to this one and save you 150£ the point of this card was to some time in the future SLi it and be ready for 4K I know nothing is future proof but this card is now dead in the water and its resale value just dropped like a bomb but we still paid top dollar, I agree the card is awesome BUT and its a killer BUT (like my GFs ;p) its no 4K card and SLi makes very little difference.

I suppose money is the main issue for me it took years to save this money and I was not planning to buy a replacement card anytime soon so I feel they least they can do is remburst buyers with some sort of partial refund as the money I paid was real and did not have 50£ they could not spend.

It's a great 1440p card, and continues to be, which serves my needs personally. The 970 was never out to be a 4K performer, though I agree the slower 500MB of memory could make a difference in SLI for higher resolutions.

I really do understand why so many people are upset but its performance numbers haven't changed, I bought it based on those. I'm bugged we were misled, and if you feel you'd like a refund I'd say go for it, you shouldn't have much trouble getting one.

Your point about resale value is interesting, I hope it doesn't drop too much.
 
Last edited:

policematrix

Active member
There's plenty of 970 SLI tests on the net that do claim it makes a difference.

I mean it's not much difference in respect to the VRAM issue, im still not happy though as it seems the card uses RAM over that slow VRAM 500 mb portion.
I think the main issue here is the lies if they did release wrong specs then they would have noticed GPU companies sell on spec and spec alone I seriously cant believe in 4 months no one noticed so they lied imo

AMD to offer special discounts to owners of GeForce GTX 970

http://www.kitguru.net/components/g...ecial-discounts-to-owners-of-geforce-gtx-970/
 
Last edited:

DeadEyeDuk

Superhero Level Poster
See I think that is a bum move by AMD. What their genius PR team hasn't thought about is that they are effectively screwing loyal AMD owners and rewarding members of the superior nVidia race with a discount...in one's opinion :)
 

Wozza63

Biblical Poster
See I think that is a bum move by AMD. What their genius PR team hasn't thought about is that they are effectively screwing loyal AMD owners and rewarding members of the superior nVidia race with a discount...in one's opinion :)

A lot of companies do have new customer offers though. I seem to remember a lot of banks doing this. Oh and Papa Johns, always offer 33% off for new customers. I think I've got about 20 accounts with them now...
 

steaky360

Moderator
Moderator
I do think this whole thing has been a bit disappointing. I'm not sure whether its all being blown out of proportion slightly, I don't know how many people would have chosen to get a 980 (rather than a 970) if said VRAM restrictions were clear from the get go. Price/Performance the card is still excellent. I'm not saying people shouldn't be upset, as I said its very disappointing, but I'm not sure how many people have actually 'suffered' because of it.

I'm sure some people would have gone for a different card because of the VRAM restriction, but the benchmarks etc. for the card all still stand.
 

keynes

Multiverse Poster
A lot of companies do have new customer offers though. I seem to remember a lot of banks doing this. Oh and Papa Johns, always offer 33% off for new customers. I think I've got about 20 accounts with them now...

That's different. You don't need to proof you are changing from a different retailer/shop and Papa Johns is usually offering as good deals for new and existing customers :)
 

SmokeDarKnight

Author Level
UPDATE

Spoke to my retailer today and they told me that they are working hard with the Manufacturers to resolve this issue.

EVGA for example have to be contacted directly and they are offering a solution though their upgrade program.

MSI and Gigabyte are also in discussions to help out.

I got a little speech about the problem and how it will cause minimum impact in the real world and that if you are playing a game that hits 4GB anyway the same problems will ocurr whether it memory has this 0.5gb section of not. They said that the had 100's of customers calling and complaining and being quite rude for something that wasn't their fault. Problems is that customers expect the GTX 980 at the same price and delivered before they have to return their GTX 970.

I remained calm and had a chat with the guy who was extremely friendly after he got his speech out of the way and he was more than happy to sort out a refund for me and was very apologetic.

The outcome was that i ordered the 2 EVGA GTX 980's SC so that they would be delivered next day or 2 and i could wait or send the 2 MSI GTX 970's back asap.

My recommendation for anyone wanting to follow in the steps of returning these still great cards is to

Be polite (its not their fault)
Be patient (they have to try and convince you that the problem is not as big a problem as it has been advertised)
Be Friendly (these guys are receiving a lot of calls and impatient customers shouting down the phone is not a pleasant experience, stand out as a nice customer might get you further)

Hope this helps anyone thinking of sending their cards back.
 

policematrix

Active member
Dear customer

Thank you for the mail.

About this memory issue Nvidia has given below reply in its forum.
970 Memory issue

The GTX 970 is an amazing card and it performs exactly as it was designed to.
We genuinely believe it's the best card that you can buy for the price.

All the GPUs mounted on Palit GTX970 graphic cards are provided by Nvidia and they are real GTX970 GPUs.

Palit never ever attempted to provide inaccurate information to mislead our customers.
We never advertised the ROPs, L2 cache and SM configuration information in any of our promotional materials and web.
All the technical GPU spec follows what Nvidia provided.

Regarding to the onboard memory, those 4GB GDDR5 memory can be used on application demand.
Please reference the attached images files.
In our test, GTX970 will use almost 4GB memory (see 1.jpg) - running 3DMark with the settings of 2.jpg.

If any of Palit GTX 970 graphic cards have functional defects we will take our responsibility to provide warranty help.

If you concerned the technical design of GTX 970 GPU you may send a mail to Nvidia customer support to get further information.
We will also follow up whether Nvidia will have other official declaration about this issue.

BIOS updage won’t be available for this issue.
Please kindly be notified.

About the stutters issue please try below possible solutions.
1. Set “Prefer maximum performance” in “Nvidia Control Panel>Manage 3D settings>Power management” (see attached Manag...jpg photo).
2. Download the DDU to un-install current graphic card driver and clean driver leftover files completely. Then install the latest graphic card driver.
DDU: https://forums.geforce.com/default/...uninstaller-ddu-v12-9-5-1-released-06-18-14-/
Download driver website: http://www.nvidia.com/Download/Find.aspx?lang=en-us
3. If the motherboard has other PCI-E slot please change the graphic card to another PCI-E slot.
4. Please upgrade the motherboard BIOS to the latest version.


If the error remained and if it's possible please test the graphic card in another PC.
If the error happened again please contact the store where you bought the graphic card to have further check or claim warranty.

Thanks.

Palit Support
Palit Microsystem Ltd.
Website: http://www.palit.biz

PALITS response
 
Top