Real Users' Benchmarks - Rank of PCS Laptops

solidus1983

Bronze Level Poster
New Results Max Fan High Performance on both CCC and Power Plan

Firestrike: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71009640 (OC)
Firestrike Extreme: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71009985 (PB) (OC)
Firestrike Ultra: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71010150 (PB) (OC)
Timespy: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71010351 (PB) (OC)
Timespy Extreme: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71010554 (PB) (OC)
Port Royal: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/71010701 (PB) (OC)

This is also on a Custom VCurve on the GPU via MSI After Burner

I have also updated Post #290 with Stock Clocks and settings with 2933MT/s results too

@FerrariVie Time to update the table.
 

Scott

Behold The Ford Mondeo
Moderator
Is it a manual OC you have on the CPU? For pushing the OC the CPU score seems a little low to me, not much... but I think there's more in it. I wouldn't push the GPU any further though and just be aware that overclocking the GPU voids your warranty.
 

solidus1983

Bronze Level Poster
Is it a manual OC you have on the CPU? For pushing the OC the CPU score seems a little low to me, not much... but I think there's more in it. I wouldn't push the GPU any further though and just be aware that overclocking the GPU voids your warranty.

Is this question for me to answer if so, more then welcome to answer it in a Private Message as not to go off topic and will gladly explain everything thought process. As for CPU its a Non K SKU so no overclocking can be done its purely down to GPU.
 

Scott

Behold The Ford Mondeo
Moderator
Is this question for me to answer if so, more then welcome to answer it in a Private Message as not to go off topic and will gladly explain everything thought process. As for CPU its a Non K SKU so no overclocking can be done its purely down to GPU.

Ahh yes, of course it is. It's strange that other results have the clock speed higher. Not sure how they are managing it :D
 

solidus1983

Bronze Level Poster
Ranks updated, finally 😅

Smashing bud, not sure if the Benchmark runs i did stock with 2133MT/s Single & Dual Channel, 2666MT/s Dual Channel & 2933MT/s Dual Channel is of any use its in post #290.

Also noticed you put +235 is an above stock or offset set? as I was on V-Curve on core and +185 on vram.
 

FerrariVie

MOST VALUED CONTRIBUTOR
Also noticed you put +235 is an above stock or offset set? as I was on V-Curve on core and +185 on vram.
It's whatever I can see on the benchmark, which in this case is the max frequency difference compared to the stock run (either yours or someone else's with a similar build).
 

solidus1983

Bronze Level Poster
It's whatever I can see on the benchmark, which in this case is the max frequency difference compared to the stock run (either yours or someone else's with a similar build).

Ah ok, just thought i'd mention it that all just incase, after all someone might think its an Offset and then enter it in and wonder why it doesn't run the benchmarks without crashing the driver or the benchmark software or both.
 
Stock
Chassis and SpecFirestrike
3DMark
Graphics​
PhysicsAvg. GPU
Temps
URLUser
Valeon 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU + max fans)25386292602512558°Link@KriSta
Valeon 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 308025081288912465056°Link@barlew
* Recoil 17" / i7 11700K / RTX 308024838298852668066°Link@Tron1982
* Recoil 17" / i7 11700K / RTX 308024538309512402049°Link@elweegie
* Recoil 17" / i9 11900k / RTX 307024381285642635766°Link@MarkPhillips205
Valeon 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)24207273092479668°Link@KriSta
Valeon 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3080 (dGPU only)24202278952321569°Link@Azryon
Valeon 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)24158271862500564°Link@Argai74
Recoil V 15" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)23969273102371574°Link@Vergaro98
* Destian 15" / R5 5600X / RTX 307023849274132339069°Link@Tron1982
Ionico 15" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)23561264092448662°Link@Brookes_117
Recoil V 15" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)23395259212554962°Link@Seagull
Ionico 17" / R9 5900HX / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)22997255022517954°Link@tyburnjig
* Recoil IV 17" / i9 10850K / RTX 2080 Super22784268892765958°Link@Besniq82
Ionico 17" / i7 11800H / RTX 3080 (dGPU only)22663306991958272°Link@WolfSkyTrain
Ionico 17" / i7 10875H / RTX 3070 (dGPU only)22485276392148170°Link@Macco26
Ionico 17" / i7 10875H / RTX 3070 (max fans)22300273522137773°Link@Cenksenci
* Recoil 17" / i5 11400 / RTX 307022144271452064057°Link@WilRog
Ionico 17" / i7 10875H / RTX 3070 (max fans)22094278152086370°Link@pmarmotte
Ionico 17" / i7 11800H / RTX 307021733273312161172°Link@Illmatc-
Recoil V 15" / R9 5900HX / RTX 307021688235952502168°Link@Seagull
* Recoil 17" / i5 11400 / RTX 3070 (4Gb RAM)21674270481978756°Link@WilRog
Ionico 17" / i7 10875H / RTX 3070 (stock)20784255911920870°Link@kshnnnn
Defiance 15" / i7 10870H / RTX 3070 Max-Q19971249582058268°Link@subjodge
Elimina Pro 17" / i7 10750H / RTX 306018839226731781369°Link@Looka
* Nova 15" / R7 3700X / RTX 207018775203332346464°Link@leebee2110
Ionico 17" / i7 10875H / RTX 306018719215662024468°Link@cmoto
Elimina 17" / i7 10870H / RTX 306018495211152085177°Link@YogiC75
* Nova 15" / R9 3900 / RTX 207018413202952412358°Link@Hun
Elimina Pro 17" / i7 10750H / RTX 306018209212231786171°Link@RobBradley325
* Nova 15" / R5 3600 / RTX 207018185204361922269°Link@maxff9
Elimina 17" / i7 10870H / RTX 3060 (max fans)18173208852060572°Link@sandbags43
Elimina 17" / i7 10870H / RTX 306017590197252059682°Link@sandbags43
Elimina 17" / i7 10870H / RTX 306017576201521989578°Link@Style evo
Vortex IX / i7 9750H / RTX 207016846200451626463°Link@NomBidon
* Octane III 17" / i7 6700K / GTX 1080 (2016 test)167252134612508N/ALink@Scott
Defiance V 17" / i7 8750H / RTX 2080 Max-Q16631212801403362°Link@Scanian
* Octane III 17" / i7 6700K / GTX 108016627211471264960°Link@Scott
Recoil 17" / i7 8750H / RTX 2070 (2019)166021947915732N/ALink@Greenman
* Nova 15" / R3 3100 / RTX 207016601210391335857°Link@FerrariVie
Optimus Pro XI 17" / R7 4800H / RTX 206015847170472093259°Link@andjef796
Cosmos IX 15" / i7 10750H / GTX 1650 Ti9611105871702860°Link@Martinr36
Defiance II 15" / i7 6700HQ / GTX 980M (2016)852199649765N/ALink@andjef796
Defiance II 15" / i7 6700HQ / GTX 970M62607077880567°Link@Greenman
Recoil V 15" / R9 5900HX / Radeon RX Vega 8354940811045155°Link@Wessexelectricnut
Where is the Elimina 17" with the i7 11800H ?
 

Naseweisz

New member
Rank updated, thanks for taking the time to run the benchmarks and share your results! Amazing CPU score, but that surely runs hot 🌶️
Thank you. I had the laptop on a cooling stand and the internal fans forced to maximum to get through the benchmark. The temps ramp up too fast for the fans to spin up appropriately. I have now limited the processor to 65w in eco mode which runs much cooler and with minimal performance impact in my eyes: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/75012255?
 

ozka

Member
Have had a 14 core Intel Defiance+3070Ti a few weeks now but I haven't had time to try it with any games. Figured I should at least quickly test it to make sure it's as good as I hoped.


Quite happy with this. Can confirm I had left everything stock and just set "performance" mode in control centre.

Also if it's of interest, I took separate note of my temps while it was running (I have the laptop on a fanless cooling pad to raise it)
Max/Avg temp (as reported by HWinfo):
CPU: 100c/61c
GPU: 86c/50c
GPU Hotpot: 105c/60c

That's just with the standard thermal paste though, going to repaste with Noctua at some point and expect those numbers to drop signifcantly.

edit: Actually, seeing that 100c from HWinfo, I suspect there was some throttling due to temps. Going to have to remember to try again when I get around to repasting.

Main specs:
Chassis & Display Defiance Series: 17.3" Matte, Full HD, 144Hz, Pantone Validated 72% NTSC, LED Widescreen (1920x1080)
Processor (CPU) Intel® Core™ i7 14 Core Processor 12700H (2.3GHz, 4.7GHz Turbo)
Memory (RAM) 16GB Corsair 3200MHz SODIMM DDR4 (2 x 8GB)
Graphics Card NVIDIA® GeForce® RTX 3070 Ti - 8.0GB GDDR6 Video RAM - DirectX® 12.1
 
Last edited:

FerrariVie

MOST VALUED CONTRIBUTOR
Thank you. I had the laptop on a cooling stand and the internal fans forced to maximum to get through the benchmark. The temps ramp up too fast for the fans to spin up appropriately. I have now limited the processor to 65w in eco mode which runs much cooler and with minimal performance impact in my eyes: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/75012255?
That is reasonable, in my opinion. Your CPU is quite more powerful than your GPU, so it makes sense to tune it accordingly to your usage. I've done the same with mine, even though I don't have eco mode on my CPU and ended up using manual OC which worked amazing.

Have had a 14 core Intel Defiance+3070Ti a few weeks now but I haven't had time to try it with any games. Figured I should at least quickly test it to make sure it's as good as I hoped.


Quite happy with this. Can confirm I had left everything stock and just set "performance" mode in control centre.

Also if it's of interest, I took separate note of my temps while it was running (I have the laptop on a fanless cooling pad to raise it)
Max/Avg temp (as reported by HWinfo):
CPU: 100c/61c
GPU: 86c/50c
GPU Hotpot: 105c/60c

That's just with the standard thermal paste though, going to repaste with Noctua at some point and expect those numbers to drop signifcantly.

edit: Actually, seeing that 100c from HWinfo, I suspect there was some throttling due to temps. Going to have to remember to try again when I get around to repasting.

Main specs:
Chassis & Display Defiance Series: 17.3" Matte, Full HD, 144Hz, Pantone Validated 72% NTSC, LED Widescreen (1920x1080)
Processor (CPU) Intel® Core™ i7 14 Core Processor 12700H (2.3GHz, 4.7GHz Turbo)
Memory (RAM) 16GB Corsair 3200MHz SODIMM DDR4 (2 x 8GB)
Graphics Card NVIDIA® GeForce® RTX 3070 Ti - 8.0GB GDDR6 Video RAM - DirectX® 12.1
Thanks for sharing your results, will update the rank shortly. Just one thing I noticed: Have you updated your Nvidia drivers? I think you probably doesn't have a version that 3DMark is able to recognize, so my guess is that it might be a bit old (or even a beta version?).

Regarding repasting, my own experience was that the GPU temperatures decreased quite a bit (around 5 degrees), but there was no significant CPU improvements. But your results may vary depending on how well PCS applied the paste to your CPU (mine seemed good enough). I've used Noctua HT-N2, by the way.
 

Tron1982

Rising Star
So, as i was extremely pleased with PCS, and as one of my sister was pleased with her destian, my other sister buy one too
This time, it's a 5600x cpu paired with a 3060 gpu :

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/75411181

the laptop was up to date and i did the benchmark with the performance mode and the fan running at full speed
And to be honest, if the score look not too bad, the temperature look kinda hot ...
 
Top