Benchmark Results Leaderboard

K

Kerrtarna

Member
3D Mark 06

3DMark Score - 27635 3DMarks
SM2.0 Score - 10089
HDR/SM3.0 Score - 14444
CPU Score - 7085
GT1 - Return To Proxycon - 85.66 FPS
GT2 - Firefly Forest - 82.5 FPS
CPU1 - Red Valley - 2.4 FPS
CPU2 - Red Valley - 3.34 FPS
HDR1 - Canyon Flight - 181.82 FPS
HDR2 - Deep Freeze - 107.07 FPS

http://3dmark.com/3dm06/16678956
 
Gibbs

Gibbs

Gold Level Poster
You are welcome. I sometimes take a while to update em but I will keep it going. I like to see where the performance of various cards and cpu's fit in. I just hope someone with the new gen 690's will come along one day and we shall see what they have got ;)
 
keynes

keynes

Multiverse Poster
I have not seen any proper benchmark of a quad GTX 690, have you guys at PCS tested those in SLI? I'd like to go for those but that may involve selling a kidney and sleeping in the garden for a month.
 
P

PadForce

Bronze Level Poster
GTX 670 benchmark

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3532700

P8570, GTX 670, i7 3770k.

Does this stack up with what people would expect from a 670? Having read reviews saying it was not much less than 5 or 10% slower than a 680 I wasnt really expecting to be as much behind the last 680 (over 10k) as I am. Is that because I dont have an overclocked CPU?

Also bit confused why it says my CPU clock speed is 1.6ghz although I know a lot of the speeds are wrong ie the ram and GPU clock speed.

Cheers
 
Gibbs

Gibbs

Gold Level Poster
rubensolo said:
I have not seen any proper benchmark of a quad GTX 690, have you guys at PCS tested those in SLI? I'd like to go for those but that may involve selling a kidney and sleeping in the garden for a month.
Click to expand...

Not that I am aware of. I work in RMA's though so it requires someone to lose a kidney and for the PC to fail before I get close to it ;)
 
Gibbs

Gibbs

Gold Level Poster
PadForce said:
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3532700
Also bit confused why it says my CPU clock speed is 1.6ghz although I know a lot of the speeds are wrong ie the ram and GPU clock speed.
Click to expand...

That is a bit odd, but I have seen it before with FutureMark. It doesn't always report correctly. Worth checking in your bios to make sure that things are running at the right speeds though. As for the performance differences, yes an overclocked PC can make a difference. Take Narcotic's score vs. blindhamster. One has 2x 680's, the other has 1x 680 but OC and is outscoring the 2x 680's. :eek:
 
P

PadForce

Bronze Level Poster
The other thing is that my integrated HD graphics are not shown as a second graphics card. I also seem to be unable to install virtua MVP - says I dont meet the system requirement although I clearly do. Is it possible the 4000 HD graphics bit of my processor isnt installed/turned on properly? I am really struggling to find driver updates..
 
P

PadForce

Bronze Level Poster
Hmm well now it says your CPU is at 2k Mhz! Its definitely not reading that right though, ive checked my Bios. I notice yours doesnt say you have integrated HD as a second GPU either.

Sorry, probably getting off topic here so feel free to move if you want:
"In the other hand, if you would like to use the Intel® HD Graphics 4000 along with the Nvidia video card simultaneously, you would need to take advantage of a feature called, switchable graphics, which is only implemented and support by your motherboard manufacturer directly. Our generic drivers do not support the usage of this feature, therefore this configuration should work using our drivers (possible reason why the add-in card is showing conflicts on Device Manager and the long boot times). So, if this is the case, you need to refer to your computer manufacturer directly to obtain a special driver to use this configuration and check with them if you need further assistance."

Im going to try to research this a bit more..
 
Last edited:
Timbercottage

Timbercottage

Bronze Level Poster
Here's my result, quite pleased :)

http://3dmark.com/3dmv/4109055

I decided to run a test today as I'm expecting delivery of a new GTX 560ti AMP! edition tomorrow or wednesday and wanted to compare the 2 setups. I'll hopefully see an improvement!

EDIT: D'oh! Just realised I'm running the wrong version of 3dmark, I'll add the correct link in a bit.

Here's the actual link using 3D Mark 11

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3534258

Not worth showing really lol!
 
Last edited:
L

leea12345

Gold Level Poster
ok have just run 3d mark 11 in performance preset as stated in top post. im not sure what these figures mean , but if somene could explain then that be good, here you go

3DMark ScoreP14441
Graphics Score17252
Physics Score10264
Combined Score8962
GraphicsTest1 78.44
FPSGraphicsTest2 80.53
FPSGraphicsTest3 107.0
FPSGraphicsTest4 53.15
FPSPhysicsTest 32.58
FPSCombinedTest 41.69 FPS

would like to have seen a comparison graph like some have, but aint got a clue how to get that up :)

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3542045
 
Last edited:
Gibbs

Gibbs

Gold Level Poster
Updated.
Sorry Starry & Timbercottage, leea12345's score just made it so neither of you made the top 10 :(
leea12345's score takes the number 2 slot - nice!

Padforce, you moved up to 8th - much better score now!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top